Annotatio V §.XI: Predicate error — Valentinian texts irrelevant to Oral-fundamentality question
Predicate error: he aims Irenaeus’s anti-Valentinian lines at the Reformed — texts Strimesius never cited, and irrelevant to whether Oral eating is faith-fundamental.
The Reformed fully admit them anyway, and with Irenaeus say the Eucharist consists of two parts.
Latin
A Prædicato aberrat, dum Irenæi alia nonnulla, Valentinianis opposita, Reformatis opponit, non solum nullibi à me adducta, & ad rem de qua quæritur, scil. Num doctrina de Orali manducatione, Fidei Christianæ fundamentalis sit? nullo modo pertinentia, sed prætereà Reformatis itidem plenissime admissa: Quemadmodum enim Reformati cum Irenæo Eucharistiam ex duabus partibus constare ajunt.