A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §728 · Samuel Strimesius

Annotatio VI §.VII open: Wittenberger — Indigni Oral as proof presence is not imaginary

§.VII: the Wittenberger will not stop at bare assertion that the unworthy corporally eat Christ’s body.

He also tries to make that claim necessary and faith-fundamental — thinking nothing stronger proves presence is not relative or imaginary than teaching that even the faithless perceive body and blood (§.XII).

Latin

§. VII. Ceterum Clariss. Wittebergensis non in nuda assertione Manducationis corporis Christi Corporalis, indignis competentis, acquiescit, sed Necessitatem ac Fundamentalitatem quoque, quoad fidem Christianam, Assertionis illi, per id, conciliare studet, quòd fortius nihil opinatur esse, ad evincendum, præsentiam corporis Christi non esse relativam aut merè imaginariam, quæ fide & cogitatione fiat, quam si doceatur, etiam indignos & fidei expertes, corpus & sanguinem Christi percipere §. XII.

Report a mistake in this passage