Annotatio VI §.VIII: not means of salvation but means of greater judgment for the Impious
So the dissensus is not about means of salvation — Oral eating by itself saves no one, least of all the unworthy.
It is about means of greater judgment and condemnation, at least for the Impious.
Latin
Eóque porrò Dissensus eatenus non est de mediis salutis, Orali corporis Christi Manducatione per se Salutem nemini, nedum indigno, conferre aptâ natáque; Sed de mediis majoris duntaxat judicii & condemnationis, saltem quod ad impios attinet.