Judgment and the Second Coming

Origen of Alexandria, Against Celsus 4.2

Origen of Alexandria · c. 185–c. 254 AD

It is a most shameful claim that some Christians and some Jews assert that a certain god or son of a god—described as the justifier of those here—has already come down to earth or will come down, and this charge does not require a lengthy refutation. The text appears to speak accurately concerning Jews, not merely some but all of them, in that they expect a certain figure to come down to earth, while concerning Christians it says that some of them claim he has already come down. It makes clear those who, drawing from Jewish scriptures, construct the sojourn of Christ as something that has already taken place, and it seems aware that there are heresies denying that Jesus Christ is the one who was prophesied. We have already addressed in the earlier sections the matter of Christ having been prophesied, doing so to the best of our ability; therefore we do not repeat most of what could be said on this topic, so as not to be redundant. Consider then that if someone wanted to overturn the faith concerning the prophecies—or concerning Christ's sojourn or his having sojourned—with even a semblance of logical sequence, he ought to have set forth the prophecies themselves, the very ones we Christians and Jews use when debating with each other. Only in that way could he have hoped to overturn, even if it merely seemed plausible, those who are being drawn away by what he thinks is a plausible argument from their assent to the prophetic writings and the faith in Jesus as the Christ that comes through those prophecies. As it stands, however, either he is unable to answer the prophecies about Christ, or he does not even know the first thing about what has been prophesied concerning him; he puts forward not a single prophetic word, even though there are countless such prophecies about Christ, yet he presumes to accuse the prophetic writings without even stating the plausibility he would claim for them. He does not seem to know, moreover, that not all Jews say that the Christ who will come down is God or the Son of God, as we have also said in the preceding passages.

Greek

Ὅτι δὲ καὶ Χριστιανῶν τινες καὶ Ἰουδαῖοι, οἱ μὲν καταβεβηκέναι (λέγουσιν,) οἱ δὲ καταβήσεσθαι εἰς τὴν γῆν τινα θεὸν ἢ θεοῦ υἱὸν τῶν τῇδε δικαιωτὴν, τοῦτ᾿ αἴσχιστον, καὶ οὐδὲ δεῖται μακροῦ λόγου ὁ ἔλεγχος. καὶ δοκεῖ γε ἀκριβῶς περὶ μὲν Ἰουδαίων οὐ τινῶν ἀλλὰ πάντων λέγειν ὅτι οἴονταί τινα καταβήσεσθαι ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν, περὶ δὲ Χριστιανῶν οτι τινὲς αὐτῶν καταβεβηκέναι λέγουσιν. ἐμφαίνει γὰρ τοὺς ἀπὸ Ἰουδαϊκῶν γραφῶν κατασκευάζοντας τὴν Χριστοῦ ἐπιδημίαν ὡς ἤδη γεγενημένην, καὶ ἔοικεν εἰδέναι ὅτι εἰσί τινες αἱρέσεις ἀρνούμεναι Χριστὸν Ἰησοῦν εἶναι τὸν πεπροφητευμένον. ἤδη μὲν οὖν καὶ ἐν τοῖς προτέροις περὶ τοῦ πεπροφητεῦσθαι τὸν Χριστὸν κατὰ δύναμιν διειλήφαμεν, διὸ τὰ πολλὰ τῶν δυναμένων λέγεσθαι εἰς τὸν τόπον οὐκ ἐπαναλαμβάνομεν, ἵνα μὴ παλιλλογῶμεν. ὅρα δὴ ὅτι, εἴπερ μετά τινος κἂν δοκούσης ἀκολουθίας ἐβούλετο ἀνατρέπειν τὴν περὶ τῶν προφητειῶν (ἢ) περὶ τοῦ ἐπιδημήσειν ἢ ἐπιδεδημηκέναι τὸν Χριστὸν πίστιν, ἐχρῆν αὐτὸν αὐτὰς ἐκθέσθαι τὰς προφητείας. αἷς ἐν τῷ διαλέγεσθαι πρὸς ἀλλήλους χρώμεθα Χριστιανοὶ καὶ Ἰουδαῖοι· οὕτως γὰρ ἂν κἂν ἔδοξε τοὺς περισπωμένους ὑπὸ τῆς, ὡς οἴεται, πιθανότητος [δοκεῖν] ἀνατρέπειν ἀπὸ τῆς πρὸς τὰ προφητικὰ συγκαταθέσεως καὶ τῆς διὰ τὰ προφητικὰ εἰς τὸν Ἰησοῦν ὡς ὄντα Χριστὸν πίστεως· νυνὶ δὲ ἤτοι μὴ δυνάμενος ἀπαντῆσαι πρὸς τὰς περὶ Χριστοῦ προφητείας (ἢ) μηδὲ τὴν ἀρχὴν εἰδὼς, τίνα ἐστὶ τὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ προφητευόμενα, οὐδεμίαν μὲν λέξιν τίθησι προφητικὴν, καίτοι γε μυρίαι ὅσαι εἰσὶ περὶ Χριστοῦ, κατηγορεῖν δὲ οἴεται τῶν προφητικῶν, μηδ᾿ ἣν εἴποι ἂν ἐκεῖνος πιθανότητα αὐτῶν ἐκθέμενος. οὐκ οἶδε μέντοι γε ὅτι οὐ πάνυ τι Ἰουδαῖοι λέγουσι θεὸν ὄντα τὸν Χριστὸν καταβήσεσθαι ἢ θεοῦ υἱὸν, ὡς καὶ ἐν τοῖς ἀνωτέρω εἰρήκαμεν.

Report a mistake in this passage