Reading Scripture: Types and Figures

Tertullian, Against Marcion 5

Tertullian · c. 155–c. 220 AD

I have been maneuvering so far as if from a first step and at long range; from now on I will fight at close quarters and with certainty. I see that I must draw certain lines beforehand, lines against which the battle will be joined—specifically, the scriptures of the Creator. Since I will prove from them that Christ belonged to the Creator, so that afterwards, having fulfilled his Christ, I must also lay out the form and, so to speak, the nature of those scriptures themselves, lest they be dragged into controversy when applied to the issues at hand and, mixed up with the defense of those issues, blunt the reader's attention. I therefore adduce two grounds of prophetic speech that our adversaries must recognize from this point on: one, by which future events are sometimes announced as if they had already taken place. For it also belongs to divinity to regard whatever it has decreed as already perfect, because there is no distinction of time with it, since eternity itself directs a uniform state of time; and it is more characteristic of prophetic divination to regard what it foresees as already seen and thus already settled. This demonstrates in every way that a thing is future, as through Isaiah: I gave my back to the whip, my cheeks to the slap, and I did not turn my face from spitting. Whether Christ was speaking about himself, according to us, or the prophet about himself, according to the Jews, the deed was not yet done, yet it sounded as if it had already been accomplished. The other mode is the one by which most things are foreshadowed figuratively through riddles, allegories, and parables, to be understood differently from how they are written. For we read that mountains will drip sweetness, but you should not expect to suck sap from rocks or syrup from cliffs; and we hear that the earth will flow with milk and honey, but you should not believe you will ever make cakes and Samian delicacies from clods of earth. For God did not immediately promise to turn himself into a bird-catcher and a farmer when he said: I will put rivers in a thirsty region and in a desert, boxwood and cedar; and just as he predicts the conversion of nations: the beasts of the field will bless me, sirens and the daughters of the sparrow—not that he will deliver favorable omens from the young of swallows and foxes and those monstrous and fabulous songstresses. What more need I say of this kind? Since even the apostle of the heretics interprets the law that grants the ox treading out the grain an unmuzzled mouth not about oxen, but about us, and adds that the rock that supplied drink was Christ, teaching thereby that the two lines of Abraham's sons ran allegorically, and suggesting to the Ephesians that what was pronounced about man in the beginning—that he will leave father and mother and the two will become one flesh—he recognizes as referring to Christ and the church.

Latin

His proluserim quasi de gradu primo adhuc et quasi de longinquo. sed exhinc iam ad certum et comminus dimicaturus, uideo aliquas etiamnunc lineas praeducendas, ad quas erit dimicandum, ad scripturas scilicet creatoris. secundum eas enim probaturus Christum creatoris fuisse, ut postea Christo suo adimpletas, necesse habeo ipsarum quoque scripturarum formam et, ut ita dixerim, naturam demandare, ne tunc in controuersiam deductae, cum adhibentur ad causas, et sua et causarum defensione commixta obtundant lectoris intentionem. duas itaque causas prophetici eloquii adlego agnoscendas abhinc aduersariis nostris: unam, qua futura interdum pro iam transactis enuntiantur. nam et diuinitati competit quaecumque decreuerit ut perfecta reputare, quia non sit apud illam differentia temporis, apud quam uniformen statum temporis dirigit aeternitas ipsa, et diuinationi propheticae magis familiare est id, quod prospiciat, dum prospicit, iam uisum atque ita iam expunctum. id est omni modo futurum, demonstrare, sicut per Esaiam: dorsum meum posui in flagella, maxillas autem meas in palmas, faciem meam uero non auerti a sputaminibus. siue enim Christus iam tunc in semetipsum, secundum nos, siue prophetes de semetipso, secundum Iudaeos, pronuntiabat, nondum tamen factum pro iam transacto sonabat. alia species erit, qua pleraque figurate portenduntur per aenigmata et allegorias et parabolas, aliter intellegenda quam scripta sunt nam et montes legimus destillaturos dulcorem, non tamen, ut sapam de petris aut defrutum de rupibus speres, et terram audimus lacte et melle manantem, (non tamen,) ut de glebis credas te umquam placentas et Samias coacturum, quia nec statim aquilicem et agricolam se deus repromisit dicens: ponam flumina in regione sitienti et in solitudine buxum et cedrum; sicut et praedicans de nationum conuersione: benedicent me bestiae agri, sirenes et filiae passerum, non utique ab hirundinum pullis et uulpeculis et illis monstruosis fabulosisque cantricibus fausta omina relaturus est. et quid ego de isto genere amplius? cum etiam haereticorum apostolus ipsam legem indulgentem bobus terentibus os liberum non de bobus, sed de nobis interpretetur, et petram, potui subministrando comitem, Christum adleget fuisse, docens proinde et Galatas duo argumenta filiorum Abrahae allegorice cucurrisse, et suggerens Ephesiis, quod in primordio de homine praedicatum est, relicturo patrem et matrem et futuris duobus in unam carnem, id se in Christum et ecclesiam agnoscere.

Report a mistake in this passage