Cap. IX Arg. 7 Sol: God foresaw reprobates would be impenitent — but that foresight is not antecedent moving cause of reprobation; unbelief sprouts from the reprobate's perverse heart
First I premise: we do not deny that God, reprobating from eternity, foresaw that all the reprobate would be impenitent and unbelieving. We deny that that foresighted unbelief was taken by God as antecedent moving cause of reprobation itself. Nor do we grant that this unbelief sprouts from the decree of reprobation as fruit or effect of reprobation: it sprouts as bad fruit from the reprobate's bad perverse heart. When they object — If unbelief follows from reprobation, men are unjustly damned for that unbelief following from the divine reprobation decree — if they mean sequel of order or time, we deny the consequence; if sequel of causality, we deny that unbelief follows from reprobation as effect from cause.
Latin
Illud imprimis praemitto, Nos minime negare Deum reprobantem ab aeterno praevidisse omnes reprobatos fore impoenitentes et incredulos, sed negare hanc praevisam infidelitatem a Deo consideratam ut causam antecedaneam et motivam ipsius reprobationis. Neque tamen concedemus infidelitatem hanc pullulare ex decreto reprobantis tanquam fructum aut effectum reprobationis: sed pullulat ut malus fructus ex malo et perverso corde reprobati. Quando igitur objiciunt, Si ex reprobatione sequitur infidelitas, homines injuste damnantur propter hanc infidelitatem, ex Divino reprobationis decreto sequentem: si sequelam ordinis vel temporis intelligant, negamus consequentiam; si sequelam causalitatis, negamus infidelitatem ex reprobatione tanquam effectum ex causa consequi.