Cap. X Ultimum Ultimo: Fathers before Pelagius need mild reading — election referred to foresight of merits means execution, not intention (Suarez)
Last join this: the Fathers who spoke more freely before Pelagius arose require careful interpretation in many places. They sometimes refer election to foresight of merits—but election there is to be taken not as intention but as execution, as Suarez notes not amiss (Opusc. Lib. 3, De auxiliis Divinae gratiae 18). And often they draw that very foresight of merits in the elect from no first fountain but the gratuitous will of God predestinating.
Latin
Ultimo et illud jungendum, Patres illos qui ante exortum Pelagium securius loquebantur, in multis benigna interpretatione indigere. Referunt illi nonnunquam electionem ad praescientiam meritorum: sed de electione intelligendi sunt non per modum intentionis, sed per modum exsecutionis accepta, ut haud incommode annotavit Suarez, Opusc. lib. 3, De auxil. Divin. grat. cap. 18. Porro, saepenumero hanc ipsam praescientiam meritorum in electis non aliunde quam ex Dei praedestinantis gratuita voluntate ex primo fonte deducunt.