Twelve Chapters on the Faith · §2 · Gregory Thaumaturgus

The flesh is not consubstantial with the divinity

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Gregory continues his treatise with a second anathema, against saying Christ's flesh is consubstantial with the divinity.

If anyone says that the flesh of Christ is consubstantial with the divinity, and does not confess that he himself was in the form of God and was God before the ages, and that he emptied himself and took the form of a servant, as it is written, let him be anathema. For how can flesh that exists after time be called consubstantial with the sempiternal divinity? What is consubstantial is what is the same in nature and in sempiternity, without change.

Latin

Si quis dicit carnem Christi homoousion, id est consubstantialem esse divinitati, et non confitetur ipsum in forma Dei et Deum esse ante saecula, et seipsum exinanisse, et formam servi accepisse sicut scriptum est, anathema sit. Quomodo autem caro post tempus homoousios, id est eiusdem substantiae, cum sempiterna divinitate dici potest? Homoousion enim dicitur quod est idem natura et eadem sempiternitate invariabiliter.

Report a mistake in this passage