Vasquez clears Holcot, Durandus, and Pico: they still required embrace and kiss—calling refusal to adore images in any way an intolerable crime
Holcot, Durandus, and Pico, on Vasquez’s reading, still required kiss and bare head—even if they called it improper adoration of the image.
Vasquez: to teach images must not be adored at all is crime and intolerable error.
Latin
XXXIV. Ab eo vero, ut putat, errore Vasquez ibidem vindicat Holcot, Durandum, & Picum Mirandulanum, quos ostendit non negavisse amplexari nos debere imagines, salutare & osculari, atque ipsis caput nudare; etiamsi dixerint imagines per hoc improprie tantum adorari, & illam non esse proprie adorationem imaginis, sed exemplaris. Quapropter in fine capitis secundi modo citatae disputationis, affirmat scelus & crimen esse imagines non adorare, & errorem intolerabilem judicari debere, si quis doceat eas nullo modo esse adorandas.