Theological Theses · §1484 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

The School's names for the honor of Saints lack council approval

School use of dulia/hyperdulia is not yet fixed by Roman Councils.

Pérez (via Bellarmino) dislikes calling saint-cult ‘dulia,’ since the word means servitude and we are conservi, not their slaves.

Latin

IV. Porro, quanquam Theologi Ecclesiae Romanae, cultum Beatae Virginis & Sanctorum proprium, communiter Duliam & Hyperduliam vocent, ut a caeteris cultus speciebus distinguant, iste tamen vocis Duliae & Hyperduliae usus, nondum est authoritate publica Conciliorum in Ecclesia Romana sancitus atque definitus. Ac propterea Martinus Pereziius Episcopus Hispanus, in suo opere de traditionibus, referente Bellarmino, testatur sibi non multum probari nomen Duliae sumptum pro cultu Sanctorum, cum Dulia proprie significet servitutem, & nos non simus servi Sanctorum, sed conservi.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Louis Le Blanc, a Reformed professor at Sedan, sets out theology in theses argued against Rome: Scripture, faith, grace, free choice, good works and the saints.

This volume holds the Theses on Theology I–XLIII and On Faith I–XXII, in eighteen sections.

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu (1614–1675) was minister and professor of theology at the Academy of Sedan, the Reformed school on France's eastern border. His Theses were disputed by students over many years and collected in a London folio (1675).

The Theological Theses range across the whole Reformed system — Scripture, God, predestination, grace, and justifying faith — in the crisp thesis-and-proof form of the seventeenth-century schools.

Date1675 AD (Sedan theses; London collection)

No modern English.

Reference

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves).

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
Also checked PDF of the 1675 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
Also checked DjVu machine-read text of the 1675 (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake