So Matthaeus de Rispolis, and Estius agrees
Matthaeus de Rispolis teaches the same doctrine in his treatise entitled The State of the Controversy over Predefinitions and Predeterminations in Relation to Free Choice. In book 1, question 1, he argues at length that there are in God eternal predefinitions and predeterminations of the will's acts, in particular and by an absolute decree.
That decree, he holds, presupposes no conditional knowledge of how the will would determine itself if placed in such a state of things. William Estius agrees with them too, as is clear from what he writes on distinction 39 of the first book of the Sentences and on distinction 24 of the second book.
Latin
VI. Eandem doctrinam tradit Matthaeus de Rispolis in tractatu cui titulus est, Status controversiae praedefinitionum & praedeterminationum cum libero arbitrio. Ibi enim libro primo quaestione prima, multis docet & probare contendit in Deo dari praedefinitiones & praedeterminationes aeternas actuum voluntatis, idque in particulari, & decreto absoluto, quod nullam praesupponit scientiam conditionatam futurae determinationis ipsius voluntatis, si collocetur in tali rerum statu. Et his quoque consentit Gulielmus Estius ut manifeste colligitur ex iis quae apud ipsum leguntur ad distinctionem trigesimam nonam libri primi sententiarum, & ad vigesimam quartam libri secundi.