Moses struck from the list of the wise
I am surprised that Celsus places the Odrysians, the Samothracians, the Eleusinians and the Hyperboreans among the most ancient and wisest nations, yet has not seen fit to admit the Jews either among the wise or among the ancient, although many writings are current among Egyptians, Phoenicians and Greeks that bear witness to their antiquity. I thought it needless to set these out, for anyone who wishes can read what Flavius Josephus wrote in his two books on the antiquity of the Jews, where he brings together a large collection of writers who bear witness to the antiquity of the Jews. There is also the Address to the Greeks by Tatian, a later writer, who sets out with great learning those who have written about the antiquity of the Jews and of Moses. It seems, then, that Celsus says these things not truthfully but out of hostility, his aim being to bring a charge against the origin of Christianity, which depends on the Jews.
What is more, he says that Homer’s Milk-drinkers (Homer, Iliad 13.5–6), the Druids of the Gauls and the Getae are very wise and ancient nations, holding views akin to the Jewish doctrines; whether any writings of theirs are extant I do not know. But the Hebrews alone, so far as it lies with him, he shuts out from both antiquity and wisdom. Again, when he draws up a list of ancient and wise men who helped the people of their own time, and through their writings those who came after, he shut Moses out of the list of the wise. Yet of Linus, whom Celsus put first among those he named, no laws or discourses are extant that have turned nations around and healed them; whereas a whole nation, scattered over the whole inhabited world, carries the laws of Moses.
See, then, whether it was not out of open malice that he shut Moses too out of the list of the wise, while saying that Linus, Musaeus, Orpheus, Pherecydes, Zoroaster the Persian and Pythagoras held views on these matters, that their doctrines were set down in books, and that they have been preserved to this day. And he chose to forget the myth about the so-called gods as subject to human passions, which Orpheus above all wrote down.
Greek
Θαυμάζω δὲ, πῶς Ὀδρύσας μὲν καὶ Σαμόθρᾳκας καὶ Ἐλευσινίους καὶ Ὑπερβορέους ἐν τοῖς ἀρχαιοτάτοις καὶ σοφωτάτοις ἔταξεν ἔθνεσιν ὁ Κέλσος, τοὺς δὲ Ἰουδαίους οὐκ ἠξίωσεν οὔτε εἰς σοφοὺς παραδέξασθαι οὔτε εἰς ἀρχαίους· πολλῶν φερομένων συγγραμμάτων παρὰ Αἰγυπτίοις καὶ Φοίνιξι καὶ Ἕλλησι, μαρτυρούντων αὐτῶν τῇ ἀρχαιότητι, ἅπερ ἐγὼ περισσὸν ἡγησάμην εἶναι παραθέσθαι. δυνατὸν γὰρ τὸν βουλόμενον ἀναγνῶναι τὰ γεγραμμένα Φλαυίῳ Ἰωσήπῳ περὶ τῆς τῶν Ἰουδαίων ἀρχαιότητος ἐν δυσὶν, ὅπου πολλὴν συναγωγὴν συγγραφέων φέρει μαρτυρούντων τῇ Ἰουδαίων ἀρχαιότητι. καὶ Τατιανοῦ δὲ νεωτέρου φέρεται ὁ πρὸς Ἕλληνας λόγος. πολυμαθέστατα ἐκτιθεμένου τοὺς ἱστορήσαντας περὶ τῆς Ἰουδαίων καὶ Μωϋσέως ἀρχαιότητος. ἔοικεν οὖν οὐκ ἀληθῶς ἀλλὰ φιλαπεχθημόνως ὁ Κέλσος ταῦτα λέγειν, σκοπὸν ἔχων κατηγορῆσαι τῆς ἀρχῆς τοῦ χριστιανισμοῦ. ἠρτημένης ἀπὸ Ἰουδαίων. ἀλλὰ καὶ τοὺς μὲν Ὁμήρου Γαλακτοφάγους καὶ τοὺς Γαλατῶν Δρυΐδας καὶ τοὺς Γέτας σοφώτατα λέγει ἔθνη εἶναι καὶ ἀρχαῖα, περὶ τῶν συγγενῶν τοῖς Ἰουδαϊκοῖς λόγοις διαλαμβάνοντας. ὧν οὐκ οἶδα εἰ φέρεται συγγράμματα· Ἑβραίους δὲ μόνον τὸ ὅσον ἐφ᾿ ἑαυτῷ ἐκβάλλει καὶ τῆς ἀρχαιότητος καὶ τῆς σοφίας. πάλιν τε αὖ κατάλογον ποιούμενος ἀνδρῶν ἀρχαίων καὶ σοφῶν. ὠφελησάντων τοὺς κατ᾿ αὐτοὺς καὶ διὰ συγγραμμάτων τοὺς μετ᾿ αὐτοὺς, Μωϋσέα ἐξέβαλε τοῦ καταλόγου τῶν σοφῶν. καὶ Λίνου μὲν. ὃν προέταξεν ὧν ὠνόμασεν ὁ Κέλσος, οὔτε νόμοι οὔτε λόγοι φέρονται ἐπιστρέψαντες καὶ θεραπεύσαντες ἔθνη· Μωϋσέως δὲ τοὺς νόμους ὅλον ἔθνος φέρει ἐπεσπαρμένον τῇ πάσῃ οἰκουμένῃ. ὅρα οὖν εἰ μὴ αντικρυς κακουργῶν ἐξέβαλε τοῦ καταλόγου τῶν σοφῶν καὶ Μωϋσέα. Λίνον δὲ καὶ Μουσαῖον καὶ Ὀρφέα καὶ τὸν Φερεκύδην καὶ τὸν Πέρσην Ζωροάστρην καὶ Πυθαγόραν φήσας περὶ τῶνδε διειληφέναι. καὶ ἐς βίβλους κατατεθεῖσθαι τὰ ἑαυτῶν δόγματα καὶ πεφυλάχθαι αὐτὰ μέχρι δεῦρο. καὶ ἑκὼν μὲν ἐπελάθετο τοῦ περὶ τῶν νομιζομένων θεῶν μύθου ὡς ἀνθρωποπαθῶν. ἀναγεγραμμένου μάλιστα ὑπὸ Ὀρφέως.