Fragments on the New Testament · §1 · Origen of Alexandria

John catena: In the beginning was the Word (opening frag.)

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Setting him forth as craftsman of all things, the name ‘Word’ is predicated of him.

For since, as a rule, every work of crafting depends on a word, there was no other way to declare him maker of all — for those who possess it (and this is a productive state joined with guileless reason).

But the Son of God, being none other than the craftsman of wisdom and art, is fittingly named ‘Word.’

For it is not some other substance, distinct from the Word, that makes existing things through him; he himself is the maker, being God the Word.

Then, since this Word — being God in substance and being in himself the Son of God — became man for the sake of human salvation, the Word was named ‘Flesh.’

And since some, having fallen from right faith, suppose that he exists only from the time when he came forth having become man from the virgin, the theologian most rightly writes against such people: In the beginning was the Word.

And using the verbs fittingly, by ‘became’ he signifies his flesh, and by ‘was’ his Godhead.

It would have been more proper to say ‘is’ of the Word of God; but since he was declaring the Word’s existence by way of distinguishing the incarnation, which happened at a certain time, the evangelist used ‘was’ instead of ‘is.’

But one must not take the proper significations of verbs when they are applied to eternal things; for it is when the things signified by them have an existence measured by time that ‘was’ means what is no longer but once was — just as ‘is’ signifies what now exists, as ‘will be’ what is going to exist.

But since the Word of God is eternal… the fragment breaks off

Greek

Δημιουργὸν τῶν πάντων τιθέμενος αὐτὸν τὸ τοῦ Λόγου ὄνομα κατηγορεῖ αὐτοῦ. ἐπεὶ γὰρ ὡς ἐπίπαν πᾶσα δημιουργία ἤρτηται λόγου, οὐκ ἄλλως ἔδει αὐτὸν τῶν πάντων δηλῶσαι ὄντα ποιητὴν ἔχουσιν (αὕτη δέ ἐστιν ἕξις μετὰ ἀδόλου λόγου ποιητική), ὁ δὲ τοῦ θεοῦ υἱός, οὐκ ἄλλος ὢς ἢ σοφίας καὶ τέχνης δημιουργός, εἰκότως λόγος ὀνομάζεται. οὐ γὰρ ἄλλη τις ὢν οὐσία παρὰ τὸν λόγου δι᾿ αὐτοῦ ποιεὶ τὰ ὄντα, ἀλλ᾿ αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ ποιῶν, θεὸς ὢν λόγος. εἶτ᾿ ἐπεὶ ὁ λόγος οὗτος, θεὸς ὢν κατ’ οὐσίαν καὶ αὐτὸ τοῦτο θεοῦ υἱὸς ὑπάρχων, τῆς τῶν ἀνθρώπων σωτηρίας χάριν ἄνθρωπος γεγένηται, »Σὰρξ« ὁ λόγος ὠνομάσθη. καὶ ἐπεί τινες τῆς ὀρθῆς πίστεως ἐκπεσόντες οἴονται ἀπὸ τότε αὐτὸν μόνον εἶναι ἀφ’ οὑ ἐκ τῆς παρθένου ἄνθρωπος γεγονὼς προῆλθεν, ὀρθότατα πρὸς τοὺς τοιούτους ὁ θεολόγος γράφει τὸ »Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος« καὶ καταλλήλως τοῖς ῥήμασι χρησάμενος, τῷ μὲν »Ἐγένετο« ἐπὶ τῆς σαρκὸς, τῷ δὲ »Ἦν« ἐπὶ τῆς θεότητος αὐτοῦ σημαίνει]. καὶ ἦν μὲν κυριώτερον ἐπὶ τοῦ θεοῦ λόγου τὸ »Ἔστιν« εἰπεῖν· ἀλλ᾿ ἐπεὶ πρὸς διαφορὰν τῆς ἐνανθρωπήσεως γενομένης ἔν τινι καιρῷ ἐδήλου τὴν ὓπαρξιν τοῦ λόγου, ἀντὶ τοῦ »Ἔστιν« τῷ »Ἦν« ὁ εὐαγγελιστὴς κέχρηται. τῶν δὲ ῥημάτων τὰς κυρίας σημασίας ἐκλαμβάνειν οὐ δεῖ ἐπὶ τῶν ἀιδίων· ὅτε μὲν γὰρ τὰ σημαινόμενα ὑπὸ τούτων χρόνῳ συμμετρουμένην ἔχει τὴν ὕπαρξιν, ὡς τὸ Ἦν τὸ μηκέτ’ ὄν, ἀλλά ποτε ὁμοίως τὸ Ἔστι δηλοῖ τὸ νῦν ὑπάρχον, ὡς τὸ Ἔσται τὸ μέλλον ὑπάρξαι]]. ἀλλ᾿ ἐπεὶ ὁ λόγος τοῦ θεοῦ ἀίδιός ἐστι, …

Report a mistake in this passage