On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §474 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: keep hereditary-vice hypothesis or drop Rom 5 proofs

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Yet I do not see by what pact it can be elicited, this hypothesis being set—that from Adam's first sin there passed into all humans by carnal generation a vice which is truly sin, sufficient for damning the human race. And so I hold that either the arguments drawn from that chapter, or this hypothesis, which all the churches of the Protestants have hitherto held most constantly, must be renounced.

Latin

Ea tamen non video quo pacto elici possit, posita hac hypothesi manasse a primo peccato Adami in omnes homines per generationem carnalem vitium, quod vere peccatum est, damnando generi humano sufficiens. Atque ita sentio, aut argumentis ex eo capite ductis, aut huic hypothesi, quam omnes protestantium Ecclesiae constantissime hactenus tenuerunt, renunciandum esse.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake