On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §475 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: The treatise put off Placeus's replies on Romans 5

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

But by what counsel it was done by you, I do not know: that when in the Theses I went to meet the arguments which are drawn from Rom. 5, and proposed to you all my replies to be run through and refuted, you yet relegated them to chapter IX of your treatise with no mention at all of them made in this place where you treat those arguments, three chapters even being interposed between them and this treatment of yours, by which you try to suppress my opinion with human testimonies.

Latin

Quo autem consilio a te sit factum, nescio, quod cum in Thesibus obviam iverim argumentis quae ex Rom. v. ducuntur, & meas responsiones omnes tibi percurrendas ac refellendas proposueris, tu tamen eas ad caput usque IX. tractatus tui relegasti nulla prorsus earum mentione facta hoc loco, quo argumenta illa tractas, interpositis etiam inter eas & hanc tuam tractationem tribus capitibus, quibus meam sententiam humanis testimoniis opprimere conaris.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake