On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §566 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: being in Adam before peccare; not by imputation of his being

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Next you will have all to have sinned in Adam. But you will grant that they were in Adam in the way they sinned in Adam: for it is prior to be than to act or to sin. Were we therefore in Adam by an imputation of his being? You will deny it far from doubt: why then will you have us to have sinned in him by an imputation of his sinning?

Latin

Deinde tu vis omnes peccasse in Adamo. Dabis autem fuisse in Adamo quomodo in Adamo peccaverunt: prius enim est esse quam agere vel peccare. Fuimusne ergo in Adamo imputatione qua esse eius? negabis procul dubio: cur ergo vis nos in eo peccasse imputatione qua peccare ipsius?

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake