A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §663 · Samuel Strimesius

Annotatio V §.IX open: Tertia Probatio — denying Oral = denying Communion of Saints

§.IX: third proof — denying Oral is charged as denying the Communion of Saints in the Apostles’ Creed, hence a fundamental article.

Strimesius had retorted: oral eating does not cause that Communion unless the impious are mixed in with the holy — since on the Lutheran hypothesis the unworthy also eat orally.

Latin

§. IX. Tertia Autoris Probatio, Negantibus Oralem Manducationem, Communionis Sanctorum negationem imputaverat, Symbolo tamen Christianorum communi, seu Apostolicô traditæ; sic facilè evictura, de Fundamentali articulo disceptari, dum de Orali Manducatione serra Disputationis reciprocature. Quando verò ego regesseram: Communionem Sanctorum orali manducatione haud causari, nisi & impios Communioni huic immisceri velimus, non minus ac pios sanctósque, ex hypothesi Lutherana, Oraliter manducantes.

Report a mistake in this passage