Fragment of the Answers to Questions · §3 · Cyril of Alexandria

Two further questions: Hosea's marriage and Melchizedek's origin

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

After the interlocutor's argument about Lazarus, the fragment poses two further questions for solution: whether Hosea really married a prostitute and had children by her in actual deed, and what kind of being Melchizedek was.

Did the prophet Hosea take a prostitute as his wife and beget children by her in deed and actuality? Or does he say these things understood prophetically? Or again: Is Melchizedek not simply a man, nor a spirit, but a man having no origin of his coming into being from humans, recently created by God?

Greek

Εἰ ἔλαβεν Ὠσηὲ ὁ προφήτης γυναῖκα πόρνην καὶ ἐτ

έκνωσεν ἐξ αὐτῆς

πράξει καὶ ἐνεργείᾳ, ἢ προφητικῶς νοούμενα λέγει. Εἰ ὁ Μελχισεδὲκ οὐκ ἄνθρωπος

ἁπλῶς οὐδὲ πνεῦμα, ἀλλ' ἄνθρωπος ἀρχὴν γενέσεως οὐκ ἐξ ἀνθρώπων ἔχων ἀλλὰ

προσφάτως δημιουργηθεὶς ὑπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ.

Report a mistake in this passage