← §501 Read continuously §503 → Theological Theses · §502 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu
Plan — object, nature, scholastic divisions
Three questions structure the tract.
Object / extent; nature / ratio; scholastic kinds.
Limited by our mind’s weakness.
Latin V. Ut autem mirabilis hujus scientiae, quae in Deo est, plenam atque distinctam, quantum quidem patitur mentis nostrae imbecillitas, cognitionem habeamus, expendendum est primo, quod sit ejus objectum, & ad quid se extendat. Secundo, qualis illa sit, & quae ejus ratio. Denique quotuplex sit, & quae sint ejus vulgatae in schola divisiones.
Report a mistake in this passage
About this text Le Blanc wrote in the mid-seventeenth century as Reformed professor at the Academy of Sedan. This is not a patristic work.
Louis Le Blanc, a Reformed professor at Sedan, sets out theology in theses argued against Rome: Scripture, faith, grace, free choice, good works and the saints.
This volume holds the Theses on Theology I–XLIII and On Faith I–XXII, in eighteen sections.
Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu (1614–1675) was minister and professor of theology at the Academy of Sedan, the Reformed school on France's eastern border. His Theses were disputed by students over many years and collected in a London folio (1675).
The Theological Theses range across the whole Reformed system — Scripture, God, predestination, grace, and justifying faith — in the crisp thesis-and-proof form of the seventeenth-century schools.
Date 1675 AD (Sedan theses; London collection)
No modern English.
Reference
ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves).
Printed text used
We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.
Report a mistake
← §501 Read continuously §503 →