Theological Theses · §593 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

Object of praedestinatio — parallel opinion-splits in both Schools

Effect-disputes and object-disputes travel together in both Schools.

Question: under what way or aspect is man object to God predestining?

Nearly the same opinion-splits in Reformed and Roman Schools.

Latin

XXXII. Quemadmodum autem Theologi tum Ecclesiae Romanae, tum Ecclesiae Reformatae, de effectis electionis & praedestinationis varie philosophantur, sic apud utrosque judicia variant, nec parva reperitur opinionum diversitas circa praedestinationis & electionis objectum, id est, quum quaeritur sub qua ratione, & quo respectu homo praedestinanti Deo objiciatur. Eademque propemodum sententiarum discrimina quae inveniuntur in Schola Reformata, in Schola quoque Romana locum habent. Ut apparere potest repetenti quae supra dicta sunt.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Louis Le Blanc, a Reformed professor at Sedan, sets out theology in theses argued against Rome: Scripture, faith, grace, free choice, good works and the saints.

This volume holds the Theses on Theology I–XLIII and On Faith I–XXII, in eighteen sections.

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu (1614–1675) was minister and professor of theology at the Academy of Sedan, the Reformed school on France's eastern border. His Theses were disputed by students over many years and collected in a London folio (1675).

The Theological Theses range across the whole Reformed system — Scripture, God, predestination, grace, and justifying faith — in the crisp thesis-and-proof form of the seventeenth-century schools.

Date1675 AD (Sedan theses; London collection)

No modern English.

Reference

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves).

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
Also checked PDF of the 1675 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
Also checked DjVu machine-read text of the 1675 (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake