Theological Theses · §961 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

The Roman view: we are just by new inward righteousness, not imputation

Romans denying imputed justification still grant Christ's merit frees from hell's pains.

They deny imputation is the form of the name just/holy—that comes from new Spirit-wrought righteousness.

Latin

XXIX. Similiter quum negant nos per imputatam Christi justitiam justificari, negare non intendunt quin Christi justitia fidelibus donetur atque communicetur, quinque ejus unius & solius merito evadant inferni poenas, peccatis suis alioqui debitas, sed sensus eorum est, Christi meritum & obedientiam non esse formam illam, a qua fideles in Scriptura justi sanctique nominantur, sed istam eorum denominationem a nova justitia sumi, qua intus Spiritus Sancti virtute donati sunt.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Louis Le Blanc, a Reformed professor at Sedan, sets out theology in theses argued against Rome: Scripture, faith, grace, free choice, good works and the saints.

This volume holds the Theses on Theology I–XLIII and On Faith I–XXII, in eighteen sections.

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu (1614–1675) was minister and professor of theology at the Academy of Sedan, the Reformed school on France's eastern border. His Theses were disputed by students over many years and collected in a London folio (1675).

The Theological Theses range across the whole Reformed system — Scripture, God, predestination, grace, and justifying faith — in the crisp thesis-and-proof form of the seventeenth-century schools.

Date1675 AD (Sedan theses; London collection)

No modern English.

Reference

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves).

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
Also checked PDF of the 1675 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
Also checked DjVu machine-read text of the 1675 (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake