Cud without hoof / hoof without cud incomplete; heretic leftovers

Cyril: …rumination. For such the law says clean, according at least to the word just having become.

Palladius: I have understood what you say.

Cyril: So then the excellent and having completely toward virtue, he under-showed riddlingly, as at least in an animal, the one having been natural to split, and bringing-up rumination. And that beautiful and benefit-bearing to love to shake-off the one not having judgment thus, and as it were limping toward the good, and going behind of completeness the unto virtue, he enjoins again, neither for those bringing-up rumination, without having obtained the splitting, nor indeed for those having been natural to split, if they should not have rumination, having brought-on the best vote, and rather writing-down their unclean, and setting them numbered with those knowing to defile-down. So then of practical energy and quality of manners, the cloven of the foot, we affirm to be a type, thinking rightly, and reshaping the having-been-said riddlingly unto truth. And the rumination at least, we define to be a sign of word according to piety, and of dogmatic knowledge, both right and practiced. Or does it not hold thus?

Palladius: Very much so.

Cyril: So then incomplete toward virtue would reasonably be thought, and he has stood far of the needing to be wondered-at, the one boasting in good works, yet being worsted of the dogmatic rightness, and not having words of the truth unto mind. And true that also the reverse, not unclear; for dogmatic rightness, and the sweet care of the divine words, would benefit us nothing, unto at least the having completely unto a reputation of virtue, with the brightness in works not having been yoked-beside. For the one right upon both, will carry-away the vote of the being well-reputed completely. And the one lacking of the other, will have strengthless the being wondered-at in the beautiful. Some such also the Savior under-shows, saying, least in the kingdom of the heavens to have been called the one teaching on the one hand, yet not still also having done; and great again and distinguished, the one having practiced and having taught. So then unclean according to law, the one being worsted of one. And that it is fitting to depart from these, and according to no manner to be seen having shared, he was clarifying saying: ‘From the fleshes you will not eat, and of their carcasses you will not touch.’ (Matthew 5:19) For neither with living ones, he says, will you be turned-about-with. And if somehow one of such should have died, you will keep your own mind unprofane; not even so much as to say touching of the things having been made by those, clear that of words, and of polluted compositions; for such are leftovers of a human’s life. This at least the unlearned heretics are accustomed to do. For they have wandered admittedly, the ones having become teachers of the unlearning being in them; and leftovers as it were of their own impiety they have deposited-beside for their own disciples; and they, also very gladly both accept and house-in according to mind, and have a hard-to-wash-out defilement, touching as it were carcass fleshes, which are full of the last foul-smell and uncleanness (Leviticus 11:8).